Skip to main content

Relationship Between Banker and Customer


Topic: Relationship Between Banker and Customer


๐Ÿ”น 1. Meaning of Banker and Customer

  • Banker: A person or institution (like Reserve Bank of India regulated banks) that accepts deposits and lends money.
  • Customer: A person who has an account with the bank.

๐Ÿ“Œ Case Law:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Ladbroke v Todd
The court held that a person becomes a customer when they open an account and have regular dealings with the bank.


๐Ÿ”น 2. Nature of Relationship

The relationship between banker and customer is mainly:

(A) Debtor–Creditor Relationship

  • When a customer deposits money → Bank becomes debtor
  • Customer becomes creditor

๐Ÿ“Œ Case Law:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Foley v Hill
Court held that money deposited becomes bank’s property, and bank is a debtor.

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:
If you deposit ₹10,000 → bank can use it for lending; you only have a right to demand repayment.


(B) Trustee–Beneficiary Relationship

  • In special situations (like safe custody), bank acts as trustee

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:
If you keep jewellery in a locker → bank must protect it.


(C) Agent–Principal Relationship

  • Bank acts as agent when:
    • Collecting cheques
    • Making payments

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:
Bank collects cheque on your behalf → acts as your agent.


(D) Bailor–Bailee Relationship

  • When goods are deposited for safe custody

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:
Documents kept in bank → bank must return safely.


๐Ÿ”น 3. Rights of Banker

(1) Right of Lien

  • Bank can retain customer’s goods until debt is paid

๐Ÿ“Œ Case Law:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Syndicate Bank v Vijay Kumar
Bank has a general lien over securities.


(2) Right of Set-Off

  • Bank can adjust one account against another

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:
Savings account ₹50,000 + loan ₹30,000 → bank adjusts amount.


(3) Right to Charge Interest

  • Bank can charge interest on loans as per agreement

๐Ÿ”น 4. Duties of Banker

(1) Duty to Honour Cheques

  • Bank must pay cheques if:
    • Sufficient balance
    • Properly drawn

๐Ÿ“Œ Case Law:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Marzetti v Williams
Wrongful dishonour damages customer’s reputation.


(2) Duty of Secrecy

  • Bank must keep customer information confidential

๐Ÿ“Œ Case Law:
๐Ÿ‘‰ Tournier v National Provincial Bank
Bank cannot disclose information except:

  • By law
  • Public interest
  • Customer consent

(3) Duty to Follow Instructions

  • Bank must act according to customer’s mandate

๐Ÿ”น 5. Rights of Customer

  • Right to withdraw money
  • Right to secrecy
  • Right to sue bank for negligence

๐Ÿ”น 6. Liabilities of Banker

  • Wrongful dishonour
  • Negligence
  • Unauthorized transactions

๐Ÿ”น 7. Important Exam Problem (Illustration)

๐Ÿ‘‰ Problem:
A has ₹1,00,000 in bank. Bank refuses to honour his cheque despite sufficient funds.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Answer:

  • This is wrongful dishonour
  • Bank is liable for damages
  • Supported by Marzetti v Williams

๐Ÿ”น 8. Conclusion (Exam Ready)

  • Banker–customer relationship is mainly debtor-creditor
  • It changes depending on situation (agent, trustee, bailee)
  • Bank has rights (lien, set-off) and duties (honour cheque, secrecy)
  • Case laws are very important for scoring marks


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi เคธเคฎाเคธ, เคธंเคงि, เคตाเค•्เคฏांเคถ เค•े เคฒिเค เคเค• เคถเคฌ्เคฆ เคชเคฐ्เคฏाเคฏเคตाเคšी, เคตिเคฒोเคฎ เคถเคฌ्เคฆ เคฎुเคนाเคตเคฐे เค”เคฐ เคฒोเค•ोเค•्เคคिเคฏाँ เคฐเคธ, เค…เคฒंเค•ाเคฐ, เค›ंเคฆ เคตाเค•्เคฏ เคธंเคถोเคงเคจ, เคตเคฐ्เคคเคจी เค…เคชเค िเคค เค—เคฆ्เคฏांเคถ (Comprehension) เคนिंเคฆी เคธाเคนिเคค्เคฏ เค•े เคช्เคฐเคฎुเค– เคฒेเค–เค• เค”เคฐ เคฐเคšเคจाเคँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge เคญाเคฐเคค เค•ा เค‡เคคिเคนाเคธ เค”เคฐ เคธ्เคตเคคंเคค्เคฐเคคा เคธंเค—्เคฐाเคฎ เคญूเค—ोเคฒ (เคญाเคฐเคค เค”เคฐ เคตिเคถ्เคต) เคตिเคœ्เคžाเคจ เค”เคฐ เคคเค•เคจीเค• เค•เคฐेंเคŸ เค…เคซेเคฏเคฐ्เคธ เคชुเคฐเคธ्เค•ाเคฐ, เค•िเคคाเคฌें เค”เคฐ เคฒेเค–เค• เคฎเคนเคค्เคตเคชूเคฐ्เคฃ เคฐाเคท्เคŸ्เคฐीเคฏ/เค…ंเคคเคฐ्เคฐाเคท्เคŸ्เคฐीเคฏ เคธंเค—เค เคจ เค–ेเคฒเค•ूเคฆ, เคฐाเคœเคจीเคคि, เค…เคฐ्เคฅเคต्เคฏเคตเคธ्เคฅा B. Indian Constitution & Law เคธंเคตिเคงाเคจ เค•ी เคตिเคถेเคทเคคाเคँ เคฎौเคฒिเค• เค…เคงिเค•ाเคฐ เค”เคฐ เค•เคฐ्เคคเคต...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...