Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label Delhi High CourtInterlocutory OrderIntermediate OrderRevision PetitionCriminal Procedure Code (CrPC)Section 397 CrPCMaintainability of PetitionLegal RightsIndian JudiciaryCriminal Law IndiaProcedural

Delhi High Court Explains Difference Between ‘Interlocutory’ and ‘Intermediate’ Orders: Why It Matters for Your Legal Rights.

In a recent and significant judgment, the Delhi High Court shed light on a confusing yet critical legal concept — the difference between ‘interlocutory orders’ and ‘intermediate orders’ , especially in the context of deciding whether a revision petition is maintainable. What Was the Case About? The case involved a situation where one party challenged a court order by filing a revision petition under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). However, the main issue before the Delhi High Court was: Can such a petition be maintained if the order passed is ‘interlocutory’ in nature? The answer lies in understanding what ‘interlocutory’ and ‘intermediate’ orders actually mean — and how they impact your legal rights. The Legal Confusion: Interlocutory vs Intermediate Let’s break it down with an example: Interlocutory Order : These are temporary or procedural decisions that don't affect the core rights of the parties. Think of them like side notes in ...