Skip to main content

Write short notes on any two of the following:(i) Deemed Owner of House Property(ii) Deemed Seizure(iii) Appeal before Appellate Authority(iv) Belated and Revised Return.”



QUESTION 8

“Write short notes on any two of the following:
(i) Deemed Owner of House Property
(ii) Deemed Seizure
(iii) Appeal before Appellate Authority
(iv) Belated and Revised Return.”

I am giving detailed notes on all four topics, so you can choose any two in exam.


(i) DEEMED OWNER OF HOUSE PROPERTY

(Section 27, read with Section 22 of Income Tax Act)

Under the Income Tax Act, ownership of house property is not limited to the person whose name appears in the title deed.
Certain persons are treated as “Deemed Owners” even though they may not be the actual legal owner of the property.

This is to prevent tax evasion, ensure correct taxation, and avoid benami transactions.

Persons Treated as Deemed Owners (Sec. 27):

1. Transfer to spouse (other than for adequate consideration)

If a husband transfers property to wife without proper consideration, the husband remains the deemed owner.

2. Transfer to minor child

Except for a child who is minor daughter married, transferor is deemed owner.

3. Holder of impartible estate

The holder is the deemed owner and taxed for entire property.

4. Property transferred under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act

If possession is given and part consideration is paid, buyer becomes deemed owner, even without registered deed.

5. Member of co-operative society

A person allotted flat/house by a company or society is treated as deemed owner.

6. Person in possession after lease for 12 years or more

Lessee becomes deemed owner (except for monthly rent tenancy).


Important Case Laws

1. Mysore Minerals Ltd. v. CIT (1999, SC)

Held:
Ownership includes possession + right to enjoy the property, not only legal title.

2. CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997, SC)

Buyer in possession under Section 53A is deemed owner for income tax purposes.



(ii) DEEMED SEIZURE

(Under Search and Seizure Provisions – Section 132)

Deemed seizure refers to cases where the Department cannot physically seize property, but it is treated as seized by law.

This prevents the assessee from transferring or disposing of such property.

When Physical Seizure is Not Possible:

1. When assets are extremely bulky

Example:
Huge machinery, large furniture, or items difficult to transport.

2. When assets are perishable

Example:
Vegetables, fruits, or items likely to deteriorate.

3. When the property is immovable

Example:
Land, building, factory.

In such cases, AO issues an order of deemed seizure under Section 132(1)(iii).


How Deemed Seizure Works:

  1. AO tags, marks or seals the property.
  2. Assessee is prohibited from removing or transferring it.
  3. A written prohibitory order is issued.
  4. Violation may result in penalties or prosecution.

Case Law

CIT v. Tarsem Kumar (1986, SC)

Held:
When physical seizure is not possible, prohibitory orders are valid and treated as deemed seizure.



(iii) APPEAL BEFORE APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Appeal is a statutory right under the Income Tax Act to ensure fairness and justice.

First Appellate Authority – CIT (Appeals)

(Section 246A, 250)

Any assessee aggrieved by AO’s order may file an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

Orders Appealable:

  • Assessment order (143(3), 144)
  • Reassessment order (147/148)
  • Penalty orders
  • TDS defaults
  • Rectification orders

Procedure:

  1. File Form 35
  2. Pay prescribed fees
  3. Submit statement of facts + grounds of appeal
  4. CIT(A) hears both sides
  5. Order passed under Section 250(6) must be:
    • speaking order
    • with reasons
    • binding unless reversed by higher authority

Powers of CIT(A): (Sec. 251)

  • Confirm the order
  • Reduce assessment
  • Enhance assessment
  • Annul assessment
  • Delete penalties

Case Law

CIT v. Kanpur Coal Syndicate (1964, SC)

Held:
Appellate Authority has full powers equal to AO and can do what AO ought to have done.



(iv) BELATED AND REVISED RETURN


1. Belated Return (Section 139(4))

If the assessee fails to file the return within due date, he can file a belated return.

Time limit:

Belated return can be filed before 31st December of the assessment year or before completion of assessment — whichever is earlier.

Consequences:

  • Interest u/s 234A
  • Late fee u/s 234F
  • Losses (except house property loss) cannot be carried forward

2. Revised Return (Section 139(5))

If the assessee discovers:

  • any mistake,
  • wrong statement,
  • incorrect income reporting,

he may file a revised return.

Time limit:

Revised return can be filed before 31st December of the assessment year or completion of assessment.


Case Law

Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. v. CIT (1973, SC)

Mistakes can be corrected by filing a revised return if filed within specified time.

CIT v. Jagannath (1995)

Revised return cannot be used to declare income that was deliberately concealed earlier.


CONCLUSION

These four topics deal with important procedural and substantive aspects of the Income Tax Act:

  • Deemed ownership ensures correct taxation.
  • Deemed seizure ensures no asset is hidden during search.
  • Appeals ensure fairness and taxpayer rights.
  • Belated and revised returns provide flexibility to correct mistakes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...