Skip to main content

DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY – DETAILED ANALYSIS (LLB EXAM FORMAT



DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY – DETAILED ANALYSIS (LLB EXAM FORMAT)


1. Introduction of the Theory

Differential Association Theory was developed by Edwin H. Sutherland, an American criminologist, in 1939.

This is one of the most important sociological theories of crime.
Sutherland argued that crime is learned just like any other behaviour.

He rejected biological theories (criminals are born) and psychological theories (mental disorder).
Instead, he said:

“Criminal behaviour is learned through association with others.”

This forms the foundation of learning theories of crime.


2. Meaning of Differential Association

“Differential Association” means:

✔ People learn values, techniques, and attitudes from the people they associate with.
✔ If someone spends more time with people who support crime → they will learn criminal behaviour.
✔ If someone spends more time with law-abiding people → they will stay lawful.

In short:
Association determines behaviour.
The type of group you interact with shapes your life.


3. Sutherland’s 9 Principles of Differential Association Theory

(VERY IMPORTANT FOR 10–15 MARKS ANSWERS)

Sutherland gave nine fundamental propositions:


1. Criminal behaviour is learned.

Not inherited or biologically fixed.
Just like we learn language or culture, we learn crime.


2. Criminal behaviour is learned through interaction.

Learning happens through communication:

  • Words
  • Gestures
  • Observing
  • Imitation

3. Learning mainly occurs in intimate personal groups.

Close groups teach crime more effectively, such as:

  • Friends
  • Family
  • Peer group
  • Neighbourhood groups
  • Gangs

Media or movies have less influence compared to direct interaction.


4. Learning includes techniques and motives.

Techniques:

  • How to pick a lock
  • How to do fraud
  • How to steal

Motives:

  • Reasons why crime seems acceptable
  • Justification of crime (“Everyone does corruption nowadays”)

5. Motives and attitudes are learned from definitions of legal codes.

People learn whether laws are:

  • Good,
  • Bad,
  • Useless,
  • To be broken.

If more definitions favour violation → person becomes criminal.


6. A person becomes criminal because of excess of definitions favourable to violation of law.

This is the HEART of the theory.

If people hear more:

  • “Breaking law is okay”
  • “Small theft is fine”
  • “Police won’t catch you”

than:

  • “Obey law”
  • “Crime is wrong”

→ They will choose crime.


7. Differential associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, intensity.

The impact of association depends on:

  • Frequency → how often
  • Duration → how long
  • Priority → how early in life
  • Intensity → emotional significance

Example:
A child who admires a criminal friend intensely will learn crime faster.


8. Learning criminal behaviour is similar to learning any other behaviour.

Schools, family, workplace teach behaviour similarly.


9. Criminal behaviour is an expression of general needs and values, but these needs do not explain crime.

Example:
Both a worker and a thief need money, but only the thief commits a crime.
Need is same; learning is different.



4. Why Do People Become Criminal According to Sutherland?

They become criminal because:

✔ They associate with criminal persons
✔ They learn techniques
✔ They learn motives
✔ They learn favourable attitudes toward crime
✔ They accept crime as normal
✔ Their social environment supports crime

So crime is a learning process, not a mental illness.


5. Examples (Exam-Friendly)

Example 1: Peer Group Influence

A boy joins friends who gamble, drink, and steal.
He wants to fit in → he learns stealing techniques → becomes criminal.

Example 2: Family Influence

If a child grows up in a home where:

  • Father drinks
  • Brother is in gang
  • Family justifies crime

He learns crime as normal behaviour.

Example 3: Slum Neighbourhood

Where drug dealers, pickpockets, and illegal economic activities are common, children learn crime early.


6. Strengths of the Theory

✔ Explains why crime happens in some neighbourhoods more
✔ Explains white-collar crime (Sutherland’s biggest contribution)
✔ Rejects biological determinism
✔ Shows importance of environment
✔ Very useful for preventive policies


7. Criticisms

  1. Does not explain why some people resist learning crime even in bad environments
  2. Ignores psychological factors
  3. Does not explain impulsive crimes
  4. Hard to measure “excess of definitions”
  5. Overemphasizes close groups, ignores media influence

8. Contribution of Sutherland to Criminology

  • Introduced concept of white-collar crime
  • Shifted focus from body/mind to social learning
  • Showed crime is normal learned behaviour
  • Influenced later theories:
    • Social learning theory
    • Subculture theory
    • Differential identification (Glaser)

9. Exam-Ready Conclusion

Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory is a landmark sociological theory which states that criminal behaviour is learned through close associations with people who support crime. When definitions favourable to law violation are more than definitions against it, a person becomes criminal. This theory highlights the importance of family, peer group, neighbourhood, and social environment in shaping criminal behaviour.
It remains one of the most influential theories in criminology and is widely used in modern criminal justice policies.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...