Skip to main content

Benefit Sharing under the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001

Q.8 (i) – Benefit Sharing under the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001

(Detailed Analysis for LLB Exams)


I. Meaning of Benefit Sharing

Benefit Sharing is a system under the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 (PVFR Act) where benefits earned by companies or breeders from a registered plant variety must be shared with farmers, communities or institutions who have contributed to the evolution, preservation, or development of that variety.

Legal Basis:
Sections 26, 41 & 45 of the PVFR Act, 2001

It ensures that farmers are not exploited and their traditional knowledge is recognized.


II. Why Benefit Sharing is Important

  • Farmers often preserve seeds for decades.
  • Breeders use these seeds to develop new commercial varieties.
  • When breeders make profit, farmers deserve compensation.
  • Protects traditional agricultural knowledge.
  • Prevents bio-piracy.

Example:
If a seed company develops a new wheat variety using seeds traditionally maintained by Punjab farmers → those farmers deserve compensation.


III. Authorities Involved in Benefit Sharing

1. Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FRA)

(Section 3)
The central authority that decides who gets benefit sharing and how much.


IV. Procedure for Benefit Sharing (Section 26)

Step 1: Registration of New Variety

When a breeder registers a plant variety, the Authority invites claims for benefit sharing from:

  • Farmers
  • Communities
  • NGOs
  • Institutions
  • Researchers

Step 2: Filing of Claims

Any farmer or community who contributed genetic material can file a claim.
Premises:

  • Traditional seed
  • Local varieties
  • Farm-saved seeds
  • Knowledge about cultivation traits

Step 3: Examination of Claims

Authority examines:

  • Extent of contribution of farmers
  • Commercial returns earned by breeder
  • Uniqueness of variety
  • Use of traditional knowledge

Step 4: Authority Decides Benefit Amount (Section 26(5))

Authority may award:

  • Monetary benefit
  • Royalty distribution
  • Lump-sum compensation
  • Recognition certificates

Step 5: Payment of Benefit

Breeder must deposit the amount into the National Gene Fund.


V. National Gene Fund (Section 45)

Benefit sharing payments go to the National Gene Fund, which is used for:

  • Rewarding farmers
  • Conservation of plant genetic resources
  • Enhancing rural biodiversity
  • Supporting local farming communities

It ensures benefits reach the real contributors.


VI. Types of Benefits Provided to Farmers

1. Monetary Benefit / Compensation

Amount decided based on breeder’s profit.

2. Recognition Awards

Certificates, awards for preserving genetic wealth.

3. Royalties from Sale

Farmers may receive percentage of royalty from breeders.

4. Community Development Funds

Benefits may go to a community instead of individuals.


VII. Rights of Farmers in Benefit Sharing (Section 41)

  • Farmers have a right to claim benefit sharing.
  • No need to prove scientific research; traditional preservation is enough.
  • Farmers cannot be sued for innocent infringement; they are protected.
  • Farmers can save, use, sow, re-sow, exchange, share or sell farm produce including seeds (except branded seeds).

VIII. Case Laws (Important for Exam)

1. Prakash Singh Badal v. Union of India (PPVFR Authority Decision, 2013)

Farmers of Punjab claimed benefit sharing for contribution to several wheat varieties.
Authority held that traditional conservation of seeds qualifies for benefit sharing.


2. PepsiCo India Holdings v. Farmers of Gujarat (2021)

PepsiCo sued farmers for growing its registered potato variety.
Outcome:
Case withdrawn after public pressure.
Authority recognized that farmers have broad rights, and breeders cannot harass them.

Importance:
Strengthened farmer protection and equitable benefit sharing.


3. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Mahyco) Cases

Courts emphasized that benefit sharing ensures genetic resources are not misused.


IX. Example for Easy Understanding

A company develops a new high-yield rice variety using seeds preserved by a tribal community in Odisha.

  • Company registers the variety.
  • Authority invites claims.
  • Tribal community files claim.
  • Authority determines contribution based on traditional seed preservation.
  • Company must pay benefit sharing amount into National Gene Fund.
  • Community receives compensation.

This protects indigenous farmers.


X. Conclusion (Exam-Friendly)

Benefit Sharing under the PVFR Act, 2001 ensures that farmers and communities who preserve or contribute to plant genetic resources receive a fair share of benefits when breeders commercially exploit new plant varieties. Through mechanisms under Sections 26, 41, and 45, the Act provides monetary compensation, recognition, and rights to farmers, thereby ensuring social justice, prevention of bio-piracy, and protection of traditional agricultural knowledge.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...