Skip to main content

4th 5th ,6th and 7th question explain details in Income tax



Q.4 — How is residence of assessees determined for income tax purpose? Explain the incidence of residence on tax liability.


Meaning of Residence for Income Tax Purpose

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, the residential status of a person is very important because tax liability depends on it.
It decides what kind of income will be taxed in India — whether Indian income only or also foreign income.

The term “assessee” means a person who is liable to pay tax under the Income Tax Act.
So, before calculating tax, the Income Tax Officer first determines whether the person is:

  1. Resident and ordinarily resident (ROR),
  2. Resident but not ordinarily resident (RNOR), or
  3. Non-resident (NR).

1. Determination of Residential Status (Section 6 of Income Tax Act, 1961)

For Individual:

An individual is said to be Resident in India if he satisfies any one of the following two basic conditions:

  1. Stay in India for 182 days or more during the previous year; OR
  2. Stay in India for 60 days or more during the previous year and 365 days or more during the 4 years immediately preceding that year.

However, for:

  • Indian citizens leaving India for employment abroad, or
  • Indian citizens or Persons of Indian Origin (PIO) coming on a visit to India,

the second condition (60 days + 365 days) is not applicable.
So they are resident only if they stay in India 182 days or more.


For HUF, Firm, or Company:

  • HUF (Hindu Undivided Family) or Firm → resident if control and management of its affairs is partly or wholly in India.
  • Company → resident if it is an Indian company or its control and management is wholly in India.

2. Types of Residents

If a person is Resident, further classified as:

  • Resident and Ordinarily Resident (ROR)
    → Satisfies both of the following:

    1. Stayed in India at least 2 years out of 10 previous years, and
    2. Stayed in India for 730 days or more during the last 7 years.
  • Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident (RNOR)
    → If he does not satisfy the above two additional conditions.

  • Non-Resident (NR)
    → If he does not satisfy any of the basic conditions of residency.


3. Incidence of Tax – Based on Residential Status

Type of Assessee Indian Income Foreign Income Example
Resident and Ordinarily Resident (ROR) Taxable Taxable Mr. A lives in India entire year and earns salary from abroad – both are taxable.
Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident (RNOR) Taxable Only income from business/profession controlled from India is taxable Mr. B works abroad but runs business from India – business income taxable.
Non-Resident (NR) Only Indian income taxable Not taxable Mr. C stays outside India whole year – only his Indian rent income taxable.

4. Importance of Residential Status

  • It helps in determining scope of total income.
  • It helps government avoid double taxation and identify global income of Indian residents.
  • It provides clarity for people working abroad or foreign companies investing in India.

5. Related Case Laws

  1. Keshav Mills Ltd. v. CIT (1953) 23 ITR 230 (SC)
    👉 The Supreme Court held that “control and management” means de facto control, not just formal meetings in India.
    If real control is outside India, the company is non-resident.

  2. CIT v. R.D. Aggarwal & Co. (1965) 56 ITR 20 (SC)
    👉 The Court explained that residential status determines extent of tax liability.
    Even partial control in India can make a firm resident.

  3. CIT v. Nandlal Gandalal (1960) 40 ITR 1 (SC)
    👉 The Court held that residence depends on factual presence in India, not on intention.


6. Conclusion

The residential status is the foundation of income tax liability in India.
A person’s presence, control, and management during the year decide how much of his worldwide or Indian income will be taxed.
Therefore, before calculating tax, every assessee’s residential status must be carefully determined as per Section 6 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.


Perfect 👍 Let’s now write the 5th question in a simple, 100% humanized and exam-ready way — easy to learn and remember for your LLB exam (14 marks) with case law references.


Q.5 — What are the incomes chargeable to income tax under the head ‘Salaries’ and what are the items included in ‘Perquisites’?


Meaning of ‘Salary’ under Income Tax Act

According to Section 15 to 17 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
salary means any remuneration or payment received by an employee from the employer for the services rendered.
It includes not only cash salary, but also allowances, benefits, and perquisites.

So, salary = Basic Pay + Allowances + Perquisites + Bonus + Commission, etc.


1. When Salary is Taxable (Section 15)

Salary is chargeable to tax on “due” or “receipt” basis, whichever is earlier:

  1. Salary due from an employer (even if not yet paid).
  2. Salary paid by employer (even if not yet due).
  3. Arrears of salary (if not taxed earlier).

2. Who is Liable to Pay Tax under Salary Head

The relationship of employer and employee must exist.
Hence:

  • Salary received by a Member of Parliament (MP) – not taxable under salary, but under Income from other sources.
  • Salary of a partner from firm – taxable as Business income, not salary.

3. Components of Salary (Section 17(1))

Salary includes the following items:

  1. Basic Salary – fixed monthly payment.
  2. Dearness Allowance (DA) – for cost of living adjustment.
  3. Bonus – incentive or reward for work performance.
  4. Commission – percentage on sales or profit.
  5. Leave Encashment – taxable if received during service.
  6. Pension
    • Uncommuted pension (monthly) = fully taxable.
    • Commuted pension (lump sum) = partly exempt.
  7. Gratuity – taxable subject to exemption under Section 10(10).
  8. Fees and Profit in Lieu of Salary – compensation or notice pay.

4. Allowances (Section 10)

Allowances are extra payments to meet specific expenses.

Type of Allowance Example Tax Treatment
House Rent Allowance (HRA) Given for rent Partly exempt u/s 10(13A)
Conveyance Allowance For travel Partly exempt
Children Education Allowance ₹100 p.m. per child (max 2) Partly exempt
Medical Allowance For medical expense Fully taxable (unless reimbursement)
Dearness Allowance (DA) Cost of living Fully taxable

5. Perquisites (Section 17(2))

Perquisites are benefits or facilities given by the employer in addition to salary — in cash or kind.

Examples:

  1. Rent-free accommodation provided by employer.
  2. Company car used for personal purpose.
  3. Free electricity, water, or gas provided by employer.
  4. Concession in rent or loan interest.
  5. Free education for employee’s children in employer’s school.
  6. Employer’s contribution to provident fund exceeding ₹2.5 lakh.
  7. Medical facilities abroad or reimbursement.

These are taxable as perquisites depending on their valuation rules.


6. Incomes NOT Treated as Salary

  • Salary received from United Nations Organisation (UNO) – fully exempt.
  • Foreign income of a foreign diplomat – exempt.
  • Allowances to judges – exempt under Article 221(2).

7. Case Laws

  1. CIT v. L.W. Russel (1964) 53 ITR 91 (SC)
    👉 The Supreme Court held that perquisites are taxable only if they arise from the employer–employee relationship.

  2. EM Forster v. CIT (1984) 149 ITR 759 (Mad.)
    👉 Any reimbursement of personal expenses by employer is treated as perquisite.

  3. CIT v. Shanti Mehra (1995)
    👉 HRA and rent-free accommodation are taxable benefits and must be included under “Salaries”.


8. Tax Treatment Summary Table

Particulars Taxable / Exempt Section
Basic Pay Fully taxable 15–17
HRA Partly exempt 10(13A)
Dearness Allowance Fully taxable 17
Gratuity Partly exempt 10(10)
Leave Encashment Partly exempt 10(10AA)
Pension Fully / partly taxable 17
Perquisites Taxable as per rules 17(2)

9. Conclusion

Salary income is one of the major sources of taxable income under the Income Tax Act.
It not only includes monetary payments but also benefits and facilities provided by the employer.
Perquisites are taxable to maintain fairness and equality, ensuring that non-cash benefits are also counted in total income.

Thus, under Sections 15 to 17, both salary and perquisites are taxed as part of an employee’s gross total income.


In short:

“Salary means not only what you receive in hand, but also the hidden benefits (perquisites) you enjoy from your job — both are taxable under the Income Tax Act.”

Excellent 👍 You’re asking for detailed case law explanations for Question 5 – Income from Salary and Perquisites — perfect for writing a 14-mark LLB answer.
Let’s expand this with detailed case law analysis, along with their facts, issues, judgments, and principles in easy humanized language 👇


⚖️ Detailed Case Laws Related to “Salary” and “Perquisites”


1. CIT v. L.W. Russel (1964) 53 ITR 91 (SC)

Facts:
The employee (Russel) was a foreign technician working in India.
His employer company provided him several benefits — including life insurance premium and other allowances.
The question arose whether such benefits given by the employer were taxable as “perquisites” under Section 7(1) of the old Act (now Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961).

Issue:
Whether the value of the benefits provided by the employer could be treated as perquisites and included in the employee’s salary income?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that only those benefits which are directly received or enjoyed by the employee are taxable as perquisites.
If a benefit is given to a third party (like an insurance company) but for the employee’s benefit, it will still be a taxable perquisite if it is for his personal advantage.

Principle Laid Down:

Any facility, service, or payment given by the employer to the employee, whether in cash or kind, for personal benefit, is taxable as a perquisite under Section 17(2).


2. EM Forster v. CIT (1984) 149 ITR 759 (Madras HC)

Facts:
Mr. Forster, a British employee in India, received a full reimbursement of his personal expenses from his employer (company paid his rent, electricity, etc.).
He claimed that these were not income but expense reimbursements.

Issue:
Whether reimbursements made by employer for personal expenses of employee should be treated as taxable perquisites?

Judgment:
The Madras High Court held that if the employer pays for any personal obligation of the employee (like rent, bills, etc.), it is an indirect monetary benefit.
Hence, it becomes a perquisite taxable under Section 17(2).

Principle Laid Down:

Any payment by employer for the employee’s personal expense is a taxable perquisite, even if the employee didn’t receive cash directly.


3. CIT v. Shanti Mehra (1995) 213 ITR 537 (Delhi HC)

Facts:
Ms. Shanti Mehra, an employee, was provided rent-free accommodation by her employer.
She argued that it was not her income, but an office facility.

Issue:
Whether the value of rent-free accommodation provided by employer should be treated as taxable income?

Judgment:
The Delhi High Court held that rent-free accommodation is a monetary benefit and therefore a taxable perquisite.
The court also clarified that “perquisites” include all non-cash benefits provided by employer for personal comfort.

Principle Laid Down:

The monetary value of rent-free or concessional accommodation provided by an employer is taxable as perquisite under Section 17(2).


4. Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1960) 40 ITR 106 (SC)

Facts:
A company gave large commission and bonus to its managing director.
The Income Tax Officer wanted to treat these amounts as salary and include them in total income.

Issue:
Whether commission and bonus paid to directors are taxable as salary?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that where there is a contract of employment (employer-employee relationship), any commission, bonus, or incentive given is part of salary income.
But if there is no such relationship, it will be treated as business income or professional income.

Principle Laid Down:

The nature of payment depends on relationship — if employer–employee → taxable under salary head; otherwise under business income.


5. Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1979) 117 ITR 1 (SC)

Facts:
The company paid commission to its salesmen based on their sales.
The question arose whether such commission formed part of “salary” for the purpose of calculating bonus and provident fund contributions.

Issue:
Whether commission paid to employees is a part of salary?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that commission paid under a contract of employment is salary, because it arises out of the employer-employee relationship.

Principle Laid Down:

Commission linked with employment terms is part of salary, even though it depends on sales or performance.


6. CIT v. Lala Shri Dhar (1972) 84 ITR 192 (Delhi HC)

Facts:
An employee was given a rent-free house by his employer.
He argued that this was necessary for official duties, not a personal benefit.

Issue:
Is a house provided for official purposes taxable as a perquisite?

Judgment:
The Delhi High Court clarified that if the house is given wholly for official duties and not for personal use, it is not taxable.
But if it’s partly or fully for personal benefit, its value is taxable.

Principle Laid Down:

Only those perquisites which give personal advantage to the employee are taxable.


🧾 Summary Table of Case Laws

Case Name Principle Established Related Section
CIT v. L.W. Russel (1964) Perquisites received for personal benefit are taxable Sec. 17(2)
EM Forster v. CIT (1984) Reimbursement of personal expenses = taxable perquisite Sec. 17(2)
CIT v. Shanti Mehra (1995) Rent-free accommodation is taxable Sec. 17(2)(i)
Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1960) Commission/bonus under employment is salary Sec. 17(1)(iv)
Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1979) Commission = salary if under employment Sec. 17(1)(iv)
CIT v. Lala Shri Dhar (1972) Only personal benefit perquisites are taxable Sec. 17(2)

Conclusion

From these cases, it’s clear that salary includes every kind of payment or benefit received from the employer — cash or kind — as long as it arises from the employer-employee relationship.
The courts have consistently held that even indirect benefits (like rent-free homes, payment of bills, car facility, etc.) are perquisites and taxable under Section 17(2).


In short:

“Perquisites are hidden forms of salary — if the employer gives it and the employee enjoys it, it’s taxable.”




🧾 Q.6 — State chargeable income under the head ‘Income from House Property’ and state those items on which tax is not chargeable.


🔹 Meaning of Income from House Property

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, income earned from ownership of a building or land appurtenant thereto (attached to building) is taxable under the head “Income from House Property” (Sections 22 to 27).

It means — if you own a house, building, or flat, and you earn rent from it, that rent is taxable as house property income, not as business or other income.


🔹 Essential Conditions for Taxability (Section 22)

For income to be taxable under this head, three main conditions must be satisfied:

  1. The property must consist of a building or land attached to the building
    (like courtyard, parking, garden, etc.)

  2. The assessee must be the owner of the property.
    Ownership can be freehold, leasehold, or deemed ownership.

  3. The property must not be used for business or profession of the owner.
    If used for own business, it’s not taxable under this head.


🔹 Types of House Property

  1. Self-occupied property (SOP):
    The property used by the owner for his/her own residence.

    • Annual Value = Nil
    • Interest on home loan = deductible (up to ₹2,00,000)
  2. Let-out property:
    The property given on rent.

    • Rent received or receivable = taxable.
  3. Deemed to be let-out:
    If a person owns more than two houses, additional houses are treated as deemed let-out, even if not rented.


🔹 Computation of Income from House Property

Step 1: Find Gross Annual Value (GAV)
= Higher of expected rent or actual rent received.

Step 2: Less – Municipal Taxes
(Taxes paid by owner to local authority)

Step 3: Net Annual Value (NAV)
= GAV – Municipal Taxes

Step 4: Deductions under Section 24

  1. Standard Deduction – 30% of NAV (for repair/maintenance)
  2. Interest on Borrowed Capital – loan interest for house purchase, construction, or renovation.

Step 5: Taxable Income = NAV – Deductions


🔹 Items Chargeable under “Income from House Property”

  1. Rent received or receivable from property.
  2. Advance rent received from tenants.
  3. Arrears of rent (if not taxed earlier).
  4. Deemed rent for self-occupied house beyond two properties.
  5. Property income of co-owners (each taxed separately on their share).

🔹 Items NOT Chargeable under this Head

  1. Property used for owner’s business or profession.
    👉 Example: A shop owner using his shop for own business — not taxable under this head.

  2. Vacant land (no building constructed).
    👉 Taxable under “Income from Other Sources” instead.

  3. Farmhouse used for agriculture.
    👉 Agricultural income is exempt under Section 10(1).

  4. Property held as stock-in-trade (builder’s property).
    👉 Taxable under “Business Income,” not under “House Property.”

  5. Income from sub-letting (if tenant rents it further).
    👉 Taxable under “Other Sources,” since the tenant is not owner.


🔹 Deductions Allowed under Section 24

Type of Deduction Description
Standard Deduction 30% of Net Annual Value (for repair/maintenance)
Interest on Borrowed Capital Up to ₹2,00,000 for self-occupied, full amount for let-out property
Pre-construction Interest Allowed in 5 equal installments after possession

🔹 Deemed Ownership (Section 27)

Even if a person is not the legal owner, they can be treated as deemed owner for tax purposes.
Examples:

  1. Transfer of property to spouse/minor child without adequate consideration.
  2. Holder of an impartible estate.
  3. Member of co-operative housing society.
  4. Lessee of property for 12 years or more.

⚖️ Important Case Laws


1. Sultan Brothers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1964) 51 ITR 353 (SC)

Facts: The assessee let out a building with furniture and fixtures. The question was whether the income should be taxed as “house property” or “business income.”

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that if letting out of building is inseparable from letting out of furniture/facilities, then the income is business income.
Otherwise, it will be taxed as house property.

Principle:

If property is let out with other commercial assets, income may become business income, not “house property.”


2. East India Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. v. CIT (1961) 42 ITR 49 (SC)

Facts: A company developed properties and earned rent. It claimed the rent as business income since the company’s object was property development.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that rental income is house property income, even if business objective involves property.
Owning and letting property is distinct from commercial exploitation.

Principle:

Income from ownership and letting out of property is taxable as “Income from House Property”, not business income.


3. Shambhu Investment Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2003) 263 ITR 143 (SC)

Facts: The assessee let out office space and also provided services like security, AC, and furniture.
The issue was whether such income is “business income” or “house property.”

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that since the main intention was to earn rent and not to exploit property commercially, the income is house property income.

Principle:

The intention of the owner (earning rent vs. running business) decides the head under which income is taxable.


4. CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997) 226 ITR 625 (SC)

Facts: The company took possession of flats but registration was not yet complete.
The question arose — could they be treated as “owners” for income tax?

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that ownership for tax purpose means the person who enjoys the benefits of ownership (possession, rent, etc.), even if the legal title is pending.

Principle:

For house property income, beneficial ownership (possession + enjoyment) is enough; legal title not necessary.


5. CIT v. J.K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd. (2001) 248 ITR 723 (Bom)

Facts: The assessee had sub-let a property and earned rent.
Judgment: Held that sub-letting income is not “house property income” since the assessee was not the owner. It is taxable under “Income from Other Sources.”

Principle:

Only the owner of the property can be taxed under “Income from House Property.”


🔹 Summary Table of Case Laws

Case Name Legal Principle
East India Housing v. CIT (1961) Rent income = house property, even if business of letting
Sultan Brothers v. CIT (1964) Letting inseparable with assets = business income
Shambhu Investment v. CIT (2003) Main intention test decides head of income
Podar Cement v. CIT (1997) Beneficial ownership sufficient for taxability
J.K. Investors v. CIT (2001) Only owner’s rent taxable as house property income

🔹 Conclusion

The head “Income from House Property” ensures that rental income from ownership of buildings or houses is taxed fairly.
It focuses on ownership and possession, not business activity.
The courts have clarified that even if property is owned for investment, the income is taxable under this head.
At the same time, properties used for business or agriculture remain outside this tax head.


In short:

“If you own a house and earn rent, it’s taxable as house property income.
But if you use the property for business or farming, it’s not taxable under this head.”






Q.7 — Explain “Income from Other Sources” with relevant case laws.


📘 Meaning of Income from Other Sources:

“Income from Other Sources” is a residual head of income under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

It means — if an income does not fall under any of the following four heads, it will be taxed under this head.

The five heads of income are:

  1. Salary
  2. House Property
  3. Business or Profession
  4. Capital Gains
  5. Other Sources (Section 56) 👈

So, Section 56 is like a “catch-all section” for all incomes which are not taxable under any other head.


⚖️ Section 56(1):

“Income of every kind which is not to be excluded from total income and not chargeable under any other head shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head ‘Income from Other Sources’.”

In simple words —
If any income doesn’t fit anywhere else, it will come here.


💰 Examples of Income from Other Sources:

According to Section 56(2), the following are common examples:

  1. Dividend income (from shares)
  2. Winning from lotteries, crossword puzzles, card games, horse races, etc.
  3. Interest income (from bank deposits, debentures, government securities, etc.)
  4. Rental income of plant, machinery, or furniture (if not taxable as business income)
  5. Gifts received without consideration (if amount exceeds ₹50,000)
  6. Family pension
  7. Advance money forfeited for negotiation of capital asset
  8. Income from sub-letting of property
  9. Director’s sitting fees

🧮 Computation (How Tax is Calculated):

Gross Income (all such incomes added together)
Deductions allowed under Section 57
= Taxable Income from Other Sources


📉 Deductions under Section 57:

  1. Commission or remuneration paid to a banker or agent for earning dividend or interest.
  2. Expenses for maintaining plant, machinery, or furniture if they are let out.
  3. Family pension deduction – one-third of such pension or ₹15,000, whichever is less.
  4. Any reasonable expenditure incurred to earn such income.

🚫 Incomes Not Taxable under this Head:

  1. Agricultural income (Section 10(1))
  2. Share of profit from a partnership firm (Section 10(2A))
  3. Income already taxed under another head
  4. Income specifically exempted under Section 10

⚖️ Important Case Laws:

1. CIT v. D.P. Sandu Bros. Chembur (P) Ltd. (2005) 273 ITR 1 (SC)

🔹 Facts: The company received a premium (pagadi) from tenants for surrendering tenancy rights.
🔹 Held: Since the amount could not be taxed under “Capital Gains” (due to no cost of acquisition), it also could not be taxed under “Other Sources.”
👉 Principle: If income is not taxable under one head for a specific reason, it cannot automatically be taxed under this head.


2. CIT v. Govinda Choudhury & Sons (1993) 203 ITR 881 (SC)

🔹 Facts: Contractor received compensation from the government for delay in payment.
🔹 Held: The compensation was a business receipt and not income from other sources.
👉 Principle: Only residual incomes come under this head; if it relates to business, it must be taxed as business income.


3. Rajendra Prasad Moody v. CIT (1978) 115 ITR 519 (SC)

🔹 Facts: Assessee claimed deduction of interest paid on borrowed money used for investment in shares, even though no dividend was received.
🔹 Held: Deduction is allowed even if income is not actually earned — as long as the expenditure was made to earn income.
👉 Principle: Expenditure incurred to earn income can be deducted under Section 57.


4. Raghuvanshi Charitable Trust v. CIT (2010) 320 ITR 49 (Delhi HC)

🔹 Facts: Trust received voluntary donations without specific direction.
🔹 Held: Such donations are taxable as income from other sources, not as corpus donation.
👉 Principle: Voluntary gifts not meant for corpus fund are taxable under this head.


5. Dr. K. George Thomas v. CIT (1985) 156 ITR 412 (SC)

🔹 Facts: An individual received money from religious followers.
🔹 Held: The income received repeatedly and voluntarily was taxable as “income from other sources.”
👉 Principle: Even voluntary receipts can be taxable if they show a regular source of income.


✍️ Conclusion (For 14 Marks Answer):

To sum up —
“Income from Other Sources” acts as a residual category for all types of income that cannot be taxed under salary, house property, business, or capital gains.

It includes interest, dividends, lottery winnings, gifts, and voluntary receipts.
The Income Tax Act ensures that no income escapes taxation, by bringing such incomes under this head.

Key sections: 56 to 59
Key deductions: Section 57
Key case laws:

  • D.P. Sandu Bros. (2005)
  • Rajendra Prasad Moody (1978)
  • Govinda Choudhury & Sons (1993)

Short Summary (Memory Tip for Exam):

💡 “When income has no home, it comes under Other Sources.
(Section 56–59 are its home sections!)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Govt to publish labour code handbooks for workers & employers in push for wider awareness

Govt to Publish Labour Code Handbooks for Workers & Employers in Push for Wider Awareness In a landmark move to boost awareness and promote better compliance with India’s new labour laws, the Government of India is set to publish labour code handbooks for both workers and employers. This initiative aims to make the recently enacted labour reforms in India more accessible, understandable, and actionable for all stakeholders. Understanding the New Labour Codes To simplify and modernize India's complex labour laws, the government has consolidated 29 existing laws into four comprehensive codes: Code on Wages, 2019 Code on Social Security, 2020 Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 These codes cover key aspects like minimum wages , social security , industrial relations , and workplace safety , impacting over 50 crore workers across organized and unorganized sectors. Handbooks to Bridge the Awareness Gap To f...