Income tax act 1961 historical development ,assessee,assessment year previous year,agriculture income tax law in india

---

Historical Development of Income Tax Law in India

Introduction

Taxation is one of the oldest functions of a State. In India, the system of taxation existed even in ancient times. The modern legal framework of Income-tax law began during the British period and has undergone several changes. Today, the Income-tax Act, 1961 governs taxation of income in India.

---

1. Ancient and Medieval Period

• Kautilya’s Arthashastra (4th Century B.C.):
  Mentions various taxes like Bali, Bhaga, and Kara. Farmers paid 1/6th of their produce as tax.
• Mughal Period:
  Taxes were mainly in the form of land revenue (Zakat, Khiraj, Jaziya). There was no separate income tax, but revenue collection was the main source for the State.

---

2. British Period – Beginning of Modern Income Tax

• First Income-tax Act, 1860:
  Introduced by Sir James Wilson to meet financial needs after the Revolt of 1857.

  • Levy on income from property, professions, trades, offices, and salaries.
  • Abolished in 1865.

• Subsequent Acts:

  • Income Tax Act, 1867 – only for collection of arrears.
  • Income Tax Act, 1871 & 1873 – temporary laws for short-term taxation.
  • Income Tax Act, 1886 – introduced a system of taxing income under separate heads, a model still followed today.

• Income Tax Act, 1918:

  • Comprehensive Act, but replaced soon due to complexity.

• Income Tax Act, 1922:

  • First permanent Income-tax law.
  • Central Government given power to levy and collect income tax.
  • Basis of modern income-tax law in India.
  • Amended several times until replaced in 1961.

• Case Law:
  📌 CIT v. Ahmedbhai Umarbhai & Co. (1950 AIR 134, SC) – clarified powers of Parliament and provinces under Government of India Act, 1935, regarding taxation.

---

3. Post-Independence Period

• After 1947, the Income-tax Act, 1922 continued with amendments.
• Problems: Complexity, loopholes, and outdated provisions.
• Law Commission Report (1956) and Nicholas Committee (1957) recommended reforms.

---

4. Income-tax Act, 1961

• Enforced from 1st April 1962, replacing the 1922 Act.

• Comprehensive law covering:

  • Definition of income, assessee, person
  • Agricultural income exemption
  • Residential status
  • Heads of income (Salary, House Property, Business/Profession, Capital Gains, Other Sources)
  • Assessment procedures, penalties, appeals

• Amendments:
  The 1961 Act is frequently amended by Finance Acts every year.

• Case Law:
  📌 Navinchandra Mafatlal v. CIT (1954 AIR 58, SC) – held that “income” includes capital gains, expanding the meaning of income under modern law.

---

5. Recent Developments

• Direct Tax Code (DTC): Proposed to simplify income tax law but not yet implemented.
• Digital Taxation: Equalisation Levy introduced for digital economy.
• Faceless Assessment Scheme: Introduced in 2020 for transparency.
• Goods and Services Tax (GST) (2017): Although not income tax, it restructured India’s indirect taxation system.

---

Conclusion

The historical development of income-tax law in India shows a journey from ancient land revenue systems to a modern, codified statute. From the first Income-tax Act of 1860 to the comprehensive Income-tax Act of 1961, the law has evolved to meet the needs of the economy. Today, it is a dynamic law, amended annually through Finance Acts, ensuring that it adapts to changing economic realites 

---

(B )Introduction

The Income-tax Act, 1961 is the primary law governing taxation in India. For understanding how income is taxed, some important concepts are – assessee, person, income, agricultural income, previous year, and assessment year. Each of these is defined in the Act and has been clarified by case laws.

---

1. Assessee

• Definition: Section 2(7) defines “assessee” as a person by whom any tax or sum of money is payable under the Income-tax Act. It also includes:

  1. Every person against whom proceedings have been initiated under the Act.
  2. Every person deemed to be an assessee (e.g., legal heir).
  3. Every person deemed to be an assessee-in-default.

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 CIT v. S. Teja Singh (1959 AIR 352, SC)
    The Supreme Court held that liability of an assessee arises from operation of law, not from consent or agreement.
  • 📌 Anwar Ali v. CIT (1970 AIR 1782, SC)
    The court held that penalty proceedings also fall within the meaning of proceedings against the assessee.

---

2. Assessment Year (A.Y.)

• Definition: Section 2(9) defines it as the period of 12 months starting from 1st April to 31st March, immediately following the previous year.

• Income of the previous year is charged to tax in the assessment year.

• Example:
  Income earned from 1st April 2023 – 31st March 2024 (Previous Year) is assessed in A.Y. 2024-25.

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 CIT v. Govindarajulu Chetty (1955 AIR 46, Mad)
    The court held that assessment must be done in the correct assessment year; otherwise, it becomes invalid.
  • 📌 Keshav Mills Ltd. v. CIT (1953 SCR 950, SC)
    It was held that the concept of assessment year is vital and assessments cannot be made on incomes of years other than prescribed.

---

3. Previous Year

• Definition: Section 3 of the Act defines it as the financial year immediately before the assessment year in which income is earned.

• General Rule: Income of the previous year is assessed in the next assessment year.

• Exception: In case of newly set-up businesses or income of non-residents, assessment may be made in the same year.

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 Keshav Mills Ltd. v. CIT (1953)
    Assessment should be based on income of the previous year unless specific provisions provide otherwise.
  • 📌 CIT v. Badridas Ramrai Shop (1937)
    The Privy Council explained that “previous year” is essential for determining taxable income.

---

4. Agricultural Income

• Definition: Section 2(1A) defines “agricultural income” as –

  1. Rent or revenue from land in India used for agricultural purposes.
  2. Income derived from such land by agricultural operations (like tilling, sowing, harvesting).
  3. Income from buildings used for agricultural operations.

• Tax Treatment:
  Exempt under Section 10(1) of the Act, but considered for rate of tax (partial integration).

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 CIT v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy (1957 AIR 768, SC)
    Landmark case – agricultural income must involve basic operations (cultivation of land) and subsequent operations (weeding, cutting, harvesting).
  • 📌 CIT v. Kunwar Trivikram Narain Singh (1965 AIR 1153, SC)
    The Supreme Court held that income from interest on arrears of rent is not agricultural income.
  • 📌 CIT v. Narain Swadeshi Weaving Mills (1954 AIR 176, SC)
    Income from processing beyond the ordinary processes of agriculture (like manufacturing) cannot be treated as agricultural income.

---

5. Income

• Definition: Section 2(24) gives an inclusive definition of “income”. It covers:

  • Profits and gains,
  • Dividends,
  • Voluntary contributions,
  • Capital gains,
  • Winnings from lotteries, etc.

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 Emil Webber v. CIT (1993) 200 ITR 483 (SC)
    The term “income” should be given a wide meaning and covers any monetary return, regular or casual.
  • 📌 CIT v. Shaw Wallace & Co. (1932) 2 Comp Cas 276 (PC)
    The Privy Council held that “income” is a periodical monetary return coming in with regularity.
  • 📌 Navinchandra Mafatlal v. CIT (1954 AIR 58, SC)
    The court held that “income” includes capital gains also.

---

6. Person

• Definition: Section 2(31) defines “person” to include:

  1. Individual
  2. Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)
  3. Company
  4. Firm
  5. Association of Persons (AOP) or Body of Individuals (BOI)
  6. Local Authority
  7. Artificial Juridical Person (AJP)

• Case Laws:

  • 📌 Banarsi Dass v. WTO (1965) 56 ITR 224 (SC)
    Even artificial juridical persons can be assessed as a “person”.
  • 📌 Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association v. CIT (1971) 82 ITR 704 (SC)
    A caste association was treated as an AJP and hence a “person” under the Act.

---

Conclusion

The Income-tax Act carefully defines terms like assessee, person, income, agricultural income, previous year, and assessment year. These concepts form the foundation of taxation in India. Courts through landmark judgments such as Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy, Navinchandra Mafatlal, and Teja Singh have clarified their scope. A clear understanding of these terms ensures proper application of the Income-tax law.

---