Skip to main content

Geographical Indications (GI): Procedure, Duration & Renewal

 Geographical Indications (GI) in India – procedure for registration, duration of protection, renewal – with case laws 


Geographical Indications (GI): Procedure, Duration & Renewal

1. What is GI?

  • A Geographical Indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities, reputation, or characteristics essentially linked to that origin.
  • Example: Darjeeling Tea, Banarasi Saree, Mysore Silk.
  • In India, GI is governed by the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999.

2. Procedure for Registration of GI

Step 1 – Application

  • Filed to the GI Registry, Chennai (only one GI Registry in India).
  • Must be filed by an association of persons, producers, or any organization/authority representing the interest of the producers.

Step 2 – Scrutiny by Registrar

  • Registrar examines whether the application fulfills legal requirements.
  • If incomplete → Registrar can ask for amendments.

Step 3 – Show Cause Notice

  • If Registrar has objections → notice is issued.
  • Applicant must reply within 2 months.

Step 4 – Publication in GI Journal

  • If accepted, the GI is published in the Geographical Indications Journal for public objections.

Step 5 – Opposition (if any)

  • Any person can file an opposition within 3 months (extendable to 1 month).
  • Registrar hears both sides and decides.

Step 6 – Registration

  • If no opposition (or opposition fails), GI is registered and a Certificate of Registration is issued.

3. Duration of Protection

  • GI is registered for 10 years.
  • Can be renewed indefinitely for further periods of 10 years each.

4. Renewal

  • Renewal request must be filed before expiry.
  • If not renewed → Registrar may remove the GI from the register.
  • However, restoration can be requested within 1 year of removal by paying additional fees.

Important Case Laws

(A) Tea Board of India vs ITC Limited (2011, Calcutta High Court)

  • Facts:
    Tea Board of India owned the GI "Darjeeling Tea". ITC Limited opened a lounge called "Darjeeling Lounge" in one of its hotels. Tea Board objected, saying it misused GI.
  • Issue:
    Whether use of "Darjeeling Lounge" by ITC amounted to infringement of GI.
  • Decision:
    The Court held that ITC did not sell tea under the name “Darjeeling” but only used it for a lounge. This was not GI infringement.
  • Principle:
    GI protection is only against misuse in relation to goods, not for general trade names.

(B) The Scotch Whisky Association vs Golden Bottling Ltd. (2006, Delhi High Court)

  • Facts:
    Scotch Whisky Association claimed that "Scotch" can only be used for whisky made in Scotland. Golden Bottling sold whisky in India using the word “Scotch”.
  • Issue:
    Whether using "Scotch" for Indian whisky violated GI rights.
  • Decision:
    Court held yes – use of “Scotch” for Indian whisky misleads consumers. Protection of GI is meant to prevent false origin claims.
  • Principle:
    GI ensures that consumers are not deceived and genuine producers are protected.

(C) Bikaner Sweets Pvt. Ltd. vs Rajasthan State (2020) (GI tag dispute for “Bikaneri Bhujia”)

  • Facts:
    GI tag was given for "Bikaneri Bhujia". Some manufacturers outside Bikaner were using the name.
  • Decision:
    Only producers from Bikaner region can use the name “Bikaneri Bhujia”.
  • Principle:
    GI strictly ties goods to their geographical origin and reputation.

Conclusion (for exam writing)

  • Registration: Application → Examination → Publication → Opposition → Registration.
  • Duration: 10 years.
  • Renewal: Unlimited, every 10 years.
  • Case laws:
    1. Tea Board of India v. ITC Ltd. → GI only protects goods, not general names.
    2. Scotch Whisky Assn. v. Golden Bottling → Prevents consumer deception.
    3. Bikaner Sweets v. Rajasthan State → GI limited to authentic producers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision  Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances  when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and           cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...