Supreme Court to Regain Its Original Look: CJI BR Gavai Orders Removal of Glass Partitions.

In a move that blends both symbolism and substance, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai has announced that the glass partitions installed in the corridors of the Supreme Court of India will soon be removed. The decision, he explained, aims to restore the majestic institution to its original architectural form — a space designed not just for justice, but also for accessibility, dignity, and tradition.

Over the years, the Supreme Court premises have undergone various changes for security and administrative reasons. Among them was the installation of glass partitions in the main corridors, which, though functional, altered the visual and symbolic openness of the court's design. According to CJI Gavai, these barriers subtly distanced the people from their judiciary, undermining the open and inclusive spirit that the institution stands for.

“This building is not just made of stone and mortar. It reflects the ideals of justice and democracy,” CJI Gavai reportedly said while announcing the decision. He emphasized the importance of preserving the character and aura of the Supreme Court as envisaged by the nation’s founding architects and legal visionaries.

The announcement was met with appreciation from legal professionals and court staff alike, many of whom felt that the removal of the glass partitions would bring back the grandeur and solemn atmosphere the court once embodied. Legal experts also noted that such changes signal a broader effort by the judiciary to become more people-friendly and transparent — a vision in line with modern judicial reforms.

While the specific timeline for the removal hasn’t been officially released, work is expected to commence soon. The move is part of a larger initiative to improve court infrastructure while remaining rooted in tradition and constitutional values.

In a time when public trust in institutions is crucial, such symbolic gestures carry deep meaning. They serve as reminders that the Supreme Court is not just a place for legal battles but a temple of justice open to all — visibly and symbolically.

Would you like this turned into a blog post with SEO optimization or tailored for social media sharing?

Comments

UPSI Syllabus 2025 & Exam pattern 2025

UP SI 2025 Exam Pattern Subject Questions Marks General Hindi 40 100 Law/Constitution & General Knowledge 40 100 Numerical & Mental Ability Test 40 100 Mental Aptitude/Intelligence/Reasoning 40 100 Total 160 400 Exam Mode : Online (CBT) Duration : 2 hours (120 minutes) Negative Marking : No Qualifying Marks : Minimum 35% in each subject and 50% overall Subject-Wise Syllabus 1. General Hindi समास, संधि, वाक्यांश के लिए एक शब्द पर्यायवाची, विलोम शब्द मुहावरे और लोकोक्तियाँ रस, अलंकार, छंद वाक्य संशोधन, वर्तनी अपठित गद्यांश (Comprehension) हिंदी साहित्य के प्रमुख लेखक और रचनाएँ 2. Law, Constitution & General Knowledge A. General Knowledge भारत का इतिहास और स्वतंत्रता संग्राम भूगोल (भारत और विश्व) विज्ञान और तकनीक करेंट अफेयर्स पुरस्कार, किताबें और लेखक महत्वपूर्ण राष्ट्रीय/अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन खेलकूद, राजनीति, अर्थव्यवस्था B. Indian Constitution & Law संविधान की विशेषताएँ मौलिक अधिकार और कर्तव...

Arrest under BNSS 2023: Grounds, Sections, and Case Laws

Bare act provision Arrest by private person [section 40] Section 40 lays down the circumstances when a private person can arrest and procedure on such arrest Circumstances in which a private person can arrest: Any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested who in the presence of private person. i) commits a non - bailable and cognizable offence. ii) Any proclaimed offender. 2: Arrest by magistrate section 41 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS 2023), enacted to replace the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), brings a renewed focus on balancing citizen rights and policing powers . Arrest, being a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement, is rightly placed under scrutiny in BNSS 2023. Let’s break down what "arrest" means under this new law, the grounds under which it can occur, and the protective safeguards embedded within. What is Arrest Arrest is the legal restraint of a person’s libe...

Smith v Hughes (1959): A Landmark Case on Interpreting the Law

Smith v Hughes (1959): Introduction The case of Smith v Hughes (1959) is one of the most iconic examples in English law that demonstrates the Mischief Rule of statutory interpretation. At first glance, it may seem like a simple case involving a street solicitor (a prostitute), but it ended up clarifying how judges should interpret the true purpose of a law. Facts of the Case Mrs. Smith, the defendant, was a prostitute. However, unlike many others, she wasn’t soliciting from the street. Instead, she operated from inside her apartment in London. She would call out or attract clients through her window or by tapping on the glass, facing the public street below. She was charged under Section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 , which says: “It shall be an offence for a common prostitute to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution.” Now here's the twist: Smith argued she wasn’t in the street , so she claimed the law didn’t apply to her ...

Like Legal Law

Search This Blog