India’s Constitution is a masterstroke of balance—between individual liberty and the collective good. The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), laid out in Part IV (Articles 36–51), are not enforceable in court, yet they form the conscience of our legal system. But the big question is: How can something that's not legally binding still protect your rights?
What Are DPSPs?
Imagine your parents telling you to study, sleep early, and eat well—not because they’ll punish you if you don’t, but because they want you to grow into a better person. That’s what DPSPs are to the Indian State. They guide it to:
- Ensure social and economic justice
- Reduce inequality
- Promote welfare policies
- Secure a uniform civil code
- Protect the environment and heritage
While they’re not justiciable (can’t be challenged in court), they act like a north star for legislation and governance.
Can DPSPs Really Protect Individual Rights?
Here’s the twist: Even though DPSPs can’t override Fundamental Rights (Part III), courts have found ways to use them to expand and interpret rights.
Let’s look at some landmark case laws that show how this happens.
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
This was the big daddy of all cases. The Supreme Court said:
“Fundamental Rights and DPSPs are two wheels of a chariot—they must move together.”
It upheld Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution but not its “basic structure.” And DPSPs were held to be part of that basic structure. So, while not enforceable, they’re untouchable in their own way.
2. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
Here, the court struck down a constitutional amendment that gave DPSPs dominance over Fundamental Rights. The ruling was clear:
Neither DPSPs nor Fundamental Rights are superior—they must coexist.
This protected individual liberty from being sacrificed for “greater good” arguments by the State.
3. Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993)
This case interpreted the Right to Education (a DPSP under Article 45) as part of Right to Life under Article 21.
Years later, Article 21A made it a Fundamental Right.
DPSP → Fundamental Right. That’s evolution in action.
4. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)
The court ruled that the right to livelihood is part of the right to life, guided by Article 39(a) and 41 (both DPSPs).
Even pavement dwellers got justice—thanks to DPSPs being taken seriously.
So How Do DPSPs Actually Work?
- Policy Framing: Governments use DPSPs as checklists while making policies and laws.
- Judicial Interpretation: Courts interpret Fundamental Rights in light of DPSPs.
- Constitutional Amendments: Some DPSPs, like the right to education, get converted into enforceable rights.
Final Thought
DPSPs may not give you the right to sue, but they help create a society where suing might not be necessary. They’re not the sword, but they are the shield.
Comments
Post a Comment